Council refutes charity findings
The report claimed West Sussex County Council (WSCC) has seen an 86 per cent drop since 2005 - placing it third in the top 20 worst local authorities in England.
However, the county council says this is because the raw data used did not take into consideration preventative interventions which it now offers.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdA council spokesman said: “West Sussex County Council has reviewed the figures within the RNIB report and strongly refutes the charity’s interpretation of the data.
“The report makes the assumption that all people who are partially sighted have this as their primary reported diagnosis or have a certificate of visual impairment.
“The raw data used does not consider the types of preventative interventions, which West Sussex County Council offers to many people with visual impairment.
“The county council has a dedicated team of rehabilitation officers for the visually impaired (ROVI) to support the needs of individuals within West Sussex who are blind or partially sighted.”
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdIt said the number of ROVIs employed had not reduced since 2005, nor had the number of people assessed and supported by the team.
However, a spokesperson for the RNIB said it was simply reporting the raw data West Sussex County Council had provided itself.