Formal complaint to Planning Inspectorate made by Mid Sussex leader
Mr Wall informs Sir Michael Pitt that the findings of the Government Inspector David Hogger, who rejected the District Plan on the grounds the council had not met its Duty to Co-operate with neighbouring authorities, was now ‘causing significant distress in the district’.
“Our community is feeling vulnerable to speculative developers and our residents are losing confidence in the Government’s commitment to localism,” writes Mr Wall.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdHe states Neighbourhood Plans are being undermined by the decision and also questions the consistency of approach by various Inspectors working across the region.
Mr Wall adds: “The stance taken by Mid Sussex in its discussions with neighbouring councils is that it is not able to accommodate any of their unmet housing needs.
“We believe this is a reasonable one given our constraints (60% of the area is either AONB or National Park and the district is also constrained by the Habitats Directive due to the adjacent Ashdown Forest SPA).”
The leader calls for a face-to-face meeting with the Inspector Mr Hoggart, before finishing: “In conclusion, this Council believes that the Inspector’s decision was erroneous and has created a substantial obstacle in our moving forward.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide Ad“Consequently, I would be grateful if you could treat this letter as a formal complaint incorporating formal requests for feedback and support from PlNs as outlined above.”
For more on this story see next Thursday’s Middy (January 30, 2014)
What do you think? Leave a comment below, or email Letters to the Editor to [email protected]
WHAT DO YOU THINK OF NEIGHBOURHOOD PLANS? ARE YOU INVOLVED IN CREATING YOUR LOCAL PLAN?
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdMID SUSSEX HAS BEEN COMMENDED FOR ITS PATHFINDER APPROACH TO THE PLANS... BUT WHAT WILL THEY ACTUALLY ACHIEVE?
Contact [email protected] or call 01444 419 589 to discuss Neighbourhood Plans and contribute to future articles.